Competitive 7-on-7 football has been a topic of debate among players and coaches alike. While it serves a purpose within a team for quarterbacks and wide receivers to build chemistry and timing, critics argue that the competitive aspect of the game is flawed.
For many high school athletes, 7-on-7 tournaments can be a frustrating experience. Teams that are not built for the passing game often struggle to compete, leading to a disconnect between success in 7-on-7 and success in traditional football seasons. This discrepancy raises questions about the true value of competitive 7-on-7 play.
One critical aspect with 7-on-7 is it’s impact on Quarterbacks, as 7-on-7 has grown in popularity, the toughness and grit required for the QB position is being lost.
“Lots of these guys look great in a T-shirt and shorts, but are afraid when the bullets start firing in the fall.”
However, some players have found value in 7-on-7 football outside of the competitive realm. At major universities, players engage in 7-on-7 drills during the offseason to improve their skills and teamwork. Without the pressure of competition, players can focus on developing their abilities in a controlled environment.
Despite its benefits for practice, critics draw parallels between 7-on-7 football and AAU basketball. Both formats have been criticized for promoting bad habits and hindering players’ physical development. The emphasis on finesse and skill in 7-on-7 games may not translate effectively to the physical demands of traditional football.
As the popularity of 7-on-7 football continues to grow, the debate over its impact on player development and the future of the sport remains ongoing. Critics warn that without addressing the potential drawbacks of competitive 7-on-7 play, the game could face similar challenges to those seen in AAU basketball.
